Wednesday, February 24, 2010
When the Perfect Writing Relationship Founders
Hopefully, this is a blog topic that doesn't apply to any other writer but me. It's not a pleasant topic to write about; it's not a great situation to be in. But, it does present its own particular challenges that a writer needs to know how to meet.
Once upon a time, a long time ago, my crit group was bit by the fire-eating ant of all crit groups everywhere--let's write a shared world anthology!
*If your crit group does this to you, back out gracefully as quickly as you can. Fair warning. I, on the other hand, was not so smart*
While I don't doubt there are groups of writers that can and do write succesfully in a shared world, I don't think creativity is the problem. I think professionalism is the problem. You have your beat every deadline by two weeks types of writers (like, um, me) and you have the deadlines don't really mean DEADLINES, do they? types of writers. Ne'er shall the twain meet. No matter how much you try to accomodate the 'other' type of writer, someone is going to get pissed off. I'll even go further--it's usually the people who understand the concept of deadlines who lose their cool with people who don't. So, when all is said and done, I learned a valuable lesson, right?
NO MORE SHARED WORLD ANTHOLOGIES.
Brilliant. Fast forward three years.
A writing partnership can be one of the most amazing experiences of your life. You find someone that you like planning things out with, whose writing style gels with yours. You write in first person POVs as your two main characters. You build a world, negotiating all the teensy little bits of information that make up a successful fictional landscape and, armed with all of that information and the inspiration you've derived from each other, you launch into your project. You get lucky at first--you're trading a scene a day. The manuscript is getting bigger. The characters are jumping off the stage. Together you've created something new and wonderful and fantastic. It all should be cake, right? Right?
And then...the deal-breaker.
It doesn't matter what breaks the deal in the end. The relationship is irrevocably shattered from the moment the deal-breaker is introduced into the project. You may try to regain that magic you shared at the beginning, but it's never quite the same. And then you're left with a huge world built and the story only half done. So what do you do?
Hopefully, you and your writing partner are mature enough to decide together how to dispose of the shared intellectual property. Maybe your writing partner is done with it, but doesn't have a problem with you continuing the story on your own. Or vice versa. It doesn't really matter.No one likes to feel like they've wasted a year or two of their life. So perhaps, you can at least salvage a story out of the deal. Or, if you're in the middle of a series that is uncompleted, you can finish off the series in such a manner as to satisfy your readership. After all, the readership is and should be the most important thing to a writer in the end. All that artistic integrity stuff? Well, it's nice but it's hard to scrape onto toast in the mornings.
So what do you do?
First thing I recommend: cover all your bases from the beginning. Save all the professional interactions between you and your partner--preliminary scenes, world building materials, research, emails and chat transcripts. All of these things have time stamps on them if--and the gods hope it never would!--it comes down to a legal issue.
The second thing? If you're working on a series, already have an idea of how the series will resolve. If you find yourself in the horrible position of having to finish out a story, you're in a heck of a lot of a better place if you know where that story needs to go. That way, if you suddenly have to double your word output, you have a guide to help you complete the entire plot arc--and check for those continuity issues!
Third? Don't waste time being bitter. Sure--find a photo of your former writing partner and tape it up on your dartboard in the den. Throw darts at her picture as long as you want to--but keep it there. Leave the details of your parting of the ways off the internet. If you don't, the focus of your story could quickly become lost behind the real life drama of the bitchy little spat being played out in front of a live audience online. And, for that matter, don't go out of your way to encounter your former writing partner. If she hangs out on a particular forum and has for a long time, don't shimmy your little tail down to that chatroom every day and then play all innocent when your butt gets burned for the spiteful little 'neener neener neener' act you're pulling. If you're old enough to write a novel, you're old enough to know better.
And finally, never forget who you are. You are a writer. You are not defined by the writing partnership you may once have had. You were a writer before the project and you're still a writer now. Sure, it's normal to experience a bit of a funk after a traumatic professional event like this one, but shake it off and get right back to the keyboard! Sulking about it won't make things automatically better.
We can all spend a lot of time daydreaming about what might have been. But, once a writing relationship is in the past, go ahead and bury it. Complete the story or trunk it--either way leads to a final resolution that will help you move on. And, regardless of whether your writing partner quits or you do, don't cyberstalk your writing ex, lurking around like a vulture with every intention of sabotaging her every chance you get. For one thing, that rarely works out well. For another, it's a waste of time.
Just write. You'll feel better.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Aspen Mountain Press Launches New Aurora Regency Imprint!
Aspen Mountain Press will launch its new Aurora Regency imprint on July 21, 2010!
Aurora Regency at Aspen Mountain Press is a line devoted to Regency romance. Traditional Regency romances, as exemplified by Georgette Heyer’s work, are first and foremost historical fiction about a very specific (and short) era. So what are we looking for? Hopefully, this will answer any questions you might have about Aurora Regency’s guidelines.
1) We expect historical accuracy. This includes language, clothing, customs, etiquette, events and places. Your book should have rich detail, the appropriate language and slang and an understanding of life in Regency England or, if set outside of England, according to the customs of the country. That includes behavior appropriate to a character’s life, position and social situation. (For example: divorce was not an option in Regency England so no new divorcĂ©es gallivanting at Almack’s in competition with the Season’s loveliest debutantes.) Historical accuracy will be a consideration in the acceptance of manuscripts and an integral part of the editing process. If your manuscript has several historical errors, you may be asked to revise and resubmit.
2) We hope for novel plotlines or exciting new twists on old themes. We are open to paranormal or Gothic themes as long as these elements do not compromise the Regency romance genre. So if your impoverished but well-born governess falls in love with the lord of the manor that’s fine. Just make it interesting.
3) We expect romance—oh, loads of it! Every kind of hero is fair game in a Regency romance and our heroines should be head over heels in love with them. But remember—this is a Regency romance. Spice is okay; jalapeno salsa is not. In an era were even the smallest infractions would lead to social ruin, well brought up young heroines were virgins on the wedding night. {However, if your Regency is about a member of the demimonde (a courtesan) and is erotic in nature, please indicate this in your query letter.} And, naturally, a HEA is the conclusion of choice.
4) Great dialogue. In the Regency romance, conversation is well-crafted and engaging. Half of the process of falling in love occurs when the hero and heroine engage in a battle of wits. Repartee is an art form; conversation is seduction. Anachronistic sayings or language are strongly discouraged.
5) Society. Society rules these characters’ lives. The Season is capitalized for a reason. As Jane Austen said in Pride and Prejudice, “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.” Society dictates that universal truth, and in a Regency romance Society is where the bridal hunt is carried out. It can be London or Bath or Brighton or even a simple country parsonage involved in county society—but society (either capitalized or not) is as big a character as any human being.
6) Fun. Above all, Regency romances are fun—both to read and to write. The more adventures your madcap heroine has, the better. Paranormal Regencies are acceptable as are the more intricate Regency murder mysteries. Even the darker side of the Regency world is fun.
So, do you think your Regency romance fits the bill? Then submit to us! The Aurora Regency line is published by Aspen Mountain Press, a royalty-paying e-publishing company. We do not charge fees for set up or charge for editing your story once it has been accepted for publication. Our contracts request rights to the contracted work, including digital and print formats as we will provide some of our titles in print later this year.
Aurora is looking for well-researched Regency romances between 35,000 and 70,000 words, although we will bend on the upper word limit if the story merits it. Please submit exactly and only the following if you wish your manuscript to receive serious consideration:
A query letter in the body of an email with:
Your legal name, pseudonym if applicable and contact email.
Working Title
Manuscript Length
General story description in two paragraphs
Writing Credentials
Include the first chapter (or first twenty pages, whichever is shorter) embedded in the body of the email. We will not open attachments. If we like what we see, we will request the rest of the manuscript. If this is a simultaneous submission, please inform us of this in your query letter. We will consider only COMPLETED manuscripts. Aspen Mountain Press does not accept proposals from writers unknown to us. Aurora Regency at Aspen Mountain Press will open for submissions on February 15, 2010. Please send all questions and submissions to AuroraRegency@gmail.com. We accept ONLY e-submissions. Initial response times are anticipated to be no longer than 2 weeks.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Back Into The Swing of Things
The recent deluge of snow over Lancaster has pretty much forced me to stay at home. After a while, you run out of interesting things to watch on television (although thank God for the Olympics; at least it's something) and the internet starts to get stale. I don't have any new books to read, my editing desk is clear and until the yard loses a foot and a half of snow we can't get the rest of our things moved into our new house. So, the combination of all these elements (and a nasty case of bronchitis/pneumonia) have culminated in a huge spate of productivity over the last few weeks and my works in progress are reaping the benefits.
I've been delving fiercely into the final book of the Vampire Covenants trilogy, churning out about twenty six thousand words in the last couple of days and a pretty darn gripping battle scene if I do say so myself. I may have been channeling Victor Hugo, because the thought of vampires battling on the flying buttresses of Notre Dame on Bastille Day has kept me glued to the laptop for hours at a time. Supplementing the writing, of course, is all of the research that accompanies writing about such an important place and time. When I was little and my French mother took us to Paris, I remember how enthralled I was by Notre Dame--the architecture, the crypts, the stained glass that was centuries older than my country--all of it made a lasting impression on the ten-year-old kid I was at the time. That impression has been helpful as I wrote my way through that scene, but it also led to a lot of questions: what is the roof made of? (lead tiles) Were the gargoyles already there? (there were medieval gargoyles, but some of the ones there now are replacements from a nineteenth century renovation) Is this what Notre Dame looked like on July 14, 1789? (No, not really--most notably the spire is different, also added during the nineteeth century renovation)
All these little details add up. And while I remember Notre Dame very well, I did not remember that the big building in front of it (the Hotel-Dieu) is a massive medieval charity hospital and at the time my story takes place was still in ruins, having burned down a few years before and not rebuilt yet. Occasionally, I'll get distracted and read on past the information I need, which is good. Knowledge is never wasted. And then, having pulled up as many photographs of Notre Dame, the roof, the gargoyle and the architectural details of the building, I throw my characters down onto the streets of Paris on the more momentous night of French history and hope they come to life.
It's a crap shoot. I'd be willing to bet that out of the 26k I've written for this climactic scene, less than half will survive in the final draft. I'm a huge overwriter, no ifs, ands or buts about it. But hopefully, when my readers dive into that scene, they'll feel like they are actually there--and THAT is when all this hard work really pays off.
At any rate, this blog post has deviated from what I originally intended to talk about. Many of my blog posts do. I meant to tell you I was back in the swing of things and cranking out words quite nicely. But, just as my research on Notre Dame diverted my writing, it's also kidnapped and run away with this blog post.
Which, I guess, just goes to show that I really am back into my writing zone. I'm off now to get through the rest of this scene at Notre Dame and then all the way back through time to an era when Achilles' parents were falling in love and the Trojan War was barely a blip on the mythological radar.
Oh. And it's snowing again. Lovely.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
I Write...Fantasy Romance? *gulp*
Sometimes, I am not the brightest Crayola in the box. I was talking to someone the other day about writing, and he said, "So you write romance right? All the heaving breasts and ripped bodices?"
"No. I write fantasy."
He looked puzzled. "Isn't romance a fantasy?"
Avoiding the obvious comment I should have made, I replied, "No--think Lord of the Rings."
Yeah, I know. Although Tolkien probably spins in his grave everytime someone equates his work with fantasy, it is the quickest route to understanding for the genre-impaired.
And then I stopped. After thinking about it for a minute, I said slowly, "Well, you know--I guess I really do write romance. Fantasy romance."
For some reason, it was hard for my to make that statement. Why was that? Every story I've written has a romance woven into it somewhere. It may not be the focal point of the story--like Tamsen and Brial, for example--but it definitely influences the plot and the character arcs. I've always thought of my work as straight up, hard core, plain and simple swords and sorcery epic freaking high fantasy.
But it's not.
I refuse to think it's because I'm a chick; guys write romance too when you get right down to it. It just feels natural to me. My characters (and most fantasy characters in my opinion) are in the middle of a high stakes game--for power, for freedom, for humanity...whatever they're fighting for. In real life, relationships are born and nurtured hand in hand and side by side with stressful situations. When human emotions (or Elven or trollish, I suppose) are at a high pitch, it just seems natural to me that the door is opened for other, intense emotions. Emotions like love, for example, which can be wonderful and terrible at the same time. Love automatically raises the stakes, makes the struggle more intense. A character has someone else to be concerned with, someone they instinctively want to protect. Love can divide a character's focus on the battlefield or sharpen it when dealing with Machivellian machinations. Love can be both a punishment or a reward, depending on how the character sees it. A character can fight against it nobly, sacrificing her love for the sake of the greater good. Or she can embrace it wholly, allowing the swift current of love and desperation and determination sweep her up into a maelstrom of emotional turmoil which can mirror the actual plot arc leading to resolution of the conflict or, in some cases, divert that plot arc into some other unforeseen direction.
There's a tendency to think of fantasy romance like some Sleeping Beauty kind of thing, where the hero battles the supernatural to save his endangered beloved--David Eddings' series The Elenium, for example, does this. Sparhawk has to find a way to free his beloved princess from the gemstone she's been set in to preserve her life. But that's not all there is to fantasy romance. Jacqueline Carey's Kushiel's Dart series for example (yes, I gush about her a lot) deals with the love between a courtesan and a priest sworn to celibacy. Their love hinders the resolution of the conflict, distracting them from things they should be paying closer attention to but, at the same time, strengthens them for the conflict ahead.
So, at last, I was able to look at my conversation partner and admit, "Yeah, fantasy romance. That's what I write." And as far as I can tell, it's true.
And if that romance occurs over a big pile of elf guts, well, then everyone is happy. Nothing like a steaming pile of entrails to give you that rush of butterflies to your tummy. Who needs roses? Give me carnage anytime.
"No. I write fantasy."
He looked puzzled. "Isn't romance a fantasy?"
Avoiding the obvious comment I should have made, I replied, "No--think Lord of the Rings."
Yeah, I know. Although Tolkien probably spins in his grave everytime someone equates his work with fantasy, it is the quickest route to understanding for the genre-impaired.
And then I stopped. After thinking about it for a minute, I said slowly, "Well, you know--I guess I really do write romance. Fantasy romance."
For some reason, it was hard for my to make that statement. Why was that? Every story I've written has a romance woven into it somewhere. It may not be the focal point of the story--like Tamsen and Brial, for example--but it definitely influences the plot and the character arcs. I've always thought of my work as straight up, hard core, plain and simple swords and sorcery epic freaking high fantasy.
But it's not.
I refuse to think it's because I'm a chick; guys write romance too when you get right down to it. It just feels natural to me. My characters (and most fantasy characters in my opinion) are in the middle of a high stakes game--for power, for freedom, for humanity...whatever they're fighting for. In real life, relationships are born and nurtured hand in hand and side by side with stressful situations. When human emotions (or Elven or trollish, I suppose) are at a high pitch, it just seems natural to me that the door is opened for other, intense emotions. Emotions like love, for example, which can be wonderful and terrible at the same time. Love automatically raises the stakes, makes the struggle more intense. A character has someone else to be concerned with, someone they instinctively want to protect. Love can divide a character's focus on the battlefield or sharpen it when dealing with Machivellian machinations. Love can be both a punishment or a reward, depending on how the character sees it. A character can fight against it nobly, sacrificing her love for the sake of the greater good. Or she can embrace it wholly, allowing the swift current of love and desperation and determination sweep her up into a maelstrom of emotional turmoil which can mirror the actual plot arc leading to resolution of the conflict or, in some cases, divert that plot arc into some other unforeseen direction.
There's a tendency to think of fantasy romance like some Sleeping Beauty kind of thing, where the hero battles the supernatural to save his endangered beloved--David Eddings' series The Elenium, for example, does this. Sparhawk has to find a way to free his beloved princess from the gemstone she's been set in to preserve her life. But that's not all there is to fantasy romance. Jacqueline Carey's Kushiel's Dart series for example (yes, I gush about her a lot) deals with the love between a courtesan and a priest sworn to celibacy. Their love hinders the resolution of the conflict, distracting them from things they should be paying closer attention to but, at the same time, strengthens them for the conflict ahead.
So, at last, I was able to look at my conversation partner and admit, "Yeah, fantasy romance. That's what I write." And as far as I can tell, it's true.
And if that romance occurs over a big pile of elf guts, well, then everyone is happy. Nothing like a steaming pile of entrails to give you that rush of butterflies to your tummy. Who needs roses? Give me carnage anytime.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Voting Now Open for LRC Best of 2009 Awards
Hey, everyone.
I'm just getting my pimp on for The Asphodel Cycle 4: Apostle of Asphodel's multiple nominations in the Love Romances and More E-Cafe Best of 2009 Awards. If you want to vote, here's how you do it:
You need to send an email to dawn_roberto@yahoo.com with "LRC's Best of 2009 Awards" in subject line. Without that subject line, the email will be deleted. Then you vote by writing
Best Cover of 2009--Apostle of Asphodel (cover art by Renee George)
Best Fantasy Novel of 2009 -- Apostle of Asphodel by Celina Summers
Best Novel of 2009 -- Apostle of Asphodel by Celina Summers.
Feel free to copy and paste.
Voting runs from 2/15 to 2/23 and the results will be announced on 2/25. If you want to see the full list of nominees, you can do so at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LoveRomancesCafe/files/ but you have to be a member to access that page. You can join LRC by going to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LoveRomancesCafe. It's a fun place to meet authors of all genres in case you're into that sort of thing.
Stay tuned, too. I'm getting ready to roll out all kinds of great stuff for the first Mythos book, Bride of Death--which comes out in ten days! Lots of excerpts and other fun this week, so let's get to it!
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
More Nominations for Apostle of Asphodel!
Well, awards season travels on apace and The Asphodel Cycle 4: Apostle of Asphodel has managed to pick up more nominations from Love Romances and More E-Cafe! In today's announcement from LRC, Apostle was nominated for Best Cover of 2009 (cover art by the lovely Renee George) --
--and also for Best Fantasy Novel of 2009--
--and in a move that completed knocked me right off my couch, Apostle of Asphodel was also nominated for Best Novel of 2009!
To say I'm stunned is completely and irrelevantly inadequate. Over the years, I've had a great relationship both with Love Romances and More's outstanding review site as well as the incredibly fun and friendly denizens of the Love Romances and More E-Cafe. I've done a lot of book release parties there, made a lot of great friends, gotten a lot of really fantastic reviews and generally have had a hell of a lot of fun. So anytime, LR&M gives me a nod like this, it's a very special moment for me. LR&M was the first review site to really believe in my work. This nomination is the fourth nod LR&M has given to the Asphodel Cycle; every single one of those novels has been nominated for an award either by the E-Cafe or in the LR&M Golden Rose awards.
Thank you, LR&M. Thank you from the bottom of my overwhelmed heart.
Review from Love Romances and More (five out of five stars): "...Ms. Summers creates complex characters that continue to grow as you read this series. All the characters, new and old, will keep your attention as you try to figure out along with Tamsen, what her objective is and if she can overcome the obstacles placed in her path. I highly enjoyed this entire series but am sincerely hoping Ms. Summers continues on with Asphodel and her great cast of characters..."
Sunday, February 07, 2010
Guess What????
We have cover art!
The cover for Mythos 1: Bride of Death was created by artist Tuesday Dube. Ain't it cool???
And, as you may have noticed, the countdown clock is underway too. Eighteen days? Wow, that's close. Might want to stay tuned--I have a feeling that tomorrow I'll have some exciting news to post. *grin* And, as soon as I get settled in after moving into my new house, I'll get back to blogging regularly too.
Eighteen days. Wow.
Until then, GO COLTS!
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Preditors & Editors Readers Poll Results Are In!
I'm really proud and humbled to share this year's 2009 P&E Readers Poll results with you.
My short story collection, Metamorphorsis, finished in the top twenty five in the Best Anthology category and 17th in Best Cover Art. Congratulations to my fabulous cover artist Renee George for that cover, which is one of my all time favorites.
Lovely, isn't it?
The last book in The Asphodel Cycle--Apostle of Asphodel finished fourteenth in Best Sci Fi/Fantasy Novel. The Asphodel Cycle as a whole, then, has finished high in the polls for three years, garnering two top ten finishes in Best Sci Fi/Fantasy and a top five finish in Best Novel. The absolute loyalty Asphodel fans have shown over the past three years is a humbling thing to witness.
And, finally, the first book of the Covenants trilogy, Breaking the Covenants,co-written with Rob Graham finished in fifth place in the Best Erotica category. I now have a new banner to add to my collection:
Thank you.
And one more bit of news--I will be attending the RT Book Lovers Convention in Columbus, Ohio from April 28-May 2. I'll be signing books, giving away e-books and lots of other goodies. Drop by and see me at the Book Expo or just flag me down if you see me! I'm looking forward to having a great time!
And now...I'm off. This is moving week in the Summers household and I have to find a way to somehow get all of my books into portable receptacles. I'm planning on spending tomorrow afternoon settling my books and getting my kitchen in order--the two things I love most about moving. After that, it's all drudgery.
And again, thank you. Get ready, though--there's going to be a lot of fun news this week from me!
Friday, January 29, 2010
Contentment
Contentment is...
...writing for most of the day with a cat on my lap asleep and the rest of the house quiet. The kind of day where I can take a long bubble bath, while reading a new book, and then get all my laundry done in between writing sessions. The sort of afternoon where I exceed my word count for the day and just keep going because the story is flowing so well. The phone isn't ringing like mad with perceived crises in five states. My email is oddly empty, considering I've been averaging thirty real emails a day for the past few weeks.
What a fantastic day. The new 76" cat tree I ordered even came in today. Unfortunately, the box weighs a ton and I can't get it into the house. Oh well. That means the cat on the lap contentment for another afternoon until the husband gets home, carts it in and puts it together.
Nice.
It's bitterly cold outside--like maybe 10 degrees--but the big snow and ice storm is tracking south and we'll only get sideswiped by it. Maybe a couple of inches of snow, that's all. That's great anyway--it makes the silence out here in the middle of a national forest reserve a lot more crystalline and pure. It means I'll go outside tonight, bundled up in my coat and gloves and scarves, and actually be able to hear the whisper of snow sifting down upon the trees and the ground.
One of my favorite sounds in the world. Some people would call it silence; I call it symphonic.
So now a nice big cup of hot chocolate, a piece of vanilla cake (because I'm just like that) and back to a writing surge that reaffirms my love of telling a story. Let's see where my afternoon of near perfect contentment leads me.
And to the weather gods--if you want to send the storm further north, that's fine by me. I can assemble the cat tree and hang out right beside it while they perch on it and play on it and stalk the birds on the other side of the window glass who are gorging themselves at the bird feeder. I'll strike you a deal--I'll make sure the birds are fed and you can dump a foot of snow on my house. That way, everyone's happy.
I won't even let the cats out after them. It's a promise.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Clearing Out My Vision
Yeah, I know. The post title sounds like I need to get new contacts. That's not what I'm talking about though. First off, I don't wear contacts. Twenty twenty vision, thank you very much.
Second, I'm talking about writing.
Sometimes, you get so caught up in the story that you're writing that you almost become willfully blind about it. Yeah, the words may have rolled easily from your brain onto the page, but you can't really see the whole picture when you're writing that first draft. I know I can't. Building a good story is like baking a great loaf of homemade bread--you have to let the dough rest for a while so that it can rise to its fullest potential. Something I'm noticing a lot in manuscripts from new writers (and even some not so new writers like myself) is that overwhelming urge to rush that story into the oven, to serve--continuing my culinary metaphor--a half-baked loaf of bread.
Let me explain.
Once you've written that first draft, put it away. Don't immediately turn around and start editing it. Let it sit for a few days. Write something else; outline a new project or revise an old one. Once that daily dose of the completed story wears off from you, take the first draft back out. Go to your favorite reading chair--someplace away from where you work--sit down and read what you've written. Read it like, well, a reader would. Someone other than you who might have come across the story in a bookstore. Don't make notes on it, don't start editing with your red pencil. Just sit down and read all the way through without stopping.
Then, you need to come face to face with what you've written.
Is it enjoyable? Did it hold your interest? (Here's a hint: if your fingers start itching to rearrange sentences, the answer to these first two questions is 'no.') Is the main character credible. Do you like him or her? Do you care about what happens to her? Is the conflict tense? Is it easy to figure out the solution to? (especially important for mysteries. If you send me a mystery and I peg the bad guy within the first few pages of his introduction to the story, then it ain't much of a mystery if you know what I mean.)
You have to be totally honest with yourself. If you're not, you're not doing yourself any favors. You'll send your poor manuscript out to someone like me who will give you all the honesty you never wanted. A writer has got to teach themselves not only to take the cold, hard facts an editor or agent would, but to recognize those flaws first and correct them. If you have even the smallest niggling doubt about how something is working out, don't wreck your story's future and send it out. Keep it at home, work on it some more, entrust it to some critical (and brutally honest) eyes other than your own. Learn to not only accept criticism, but to yearn for it.
Clear out your vision. Sure, it's your baby but you have to be able to look at your baby with wide open eyes and say, "You know--I don't think it's ready yet." Then take it back to your desk, open the file back up and work on it some more.
Before you think I'm just spouting off advice because I think I'm entitled to, let me correct you. I'm spouting off this advice to myself more than anyone else. I am not infallible. As a matter of fact, I have numerous, grievous flaws as a writer. And every time I think I have one hell of a story and get excited about shopping it around, I've sent it out too soon and watched it die beneath a pile of rejections and a surplus of 'unfortunatelys' in my inbox.
Trust me. I know of what I speak. Don't make the same mistakes I make--do better than me. Clear out your vision about your manuscript. It's a hell of a lot easier to do that before you send the story out than to try and disinter it when it's almost--but not quite--too late.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Picking Yourself Back Up After That Rejection Email
Every writer has at least one of these days--you know, the horrible days where you check your inbox, see that agent or publisher's name on an email and excitedly open up a message that begins with some version of "Although your writing shows great promise..." or "While I enjoyed your writing immensely..." or "Unfortunately, I just didn't connect with your protagonist/hero/heroine/conflict/plotline/narrative style/sneakers/chia pet/favorite television show..."
You get the picture.
Rejection is something writers have to deal with every single day. This isn't a business for the thin-skinned. Sure, those rejections hurt--especially the one that starts off with "Dear Author" or has your name misspelled on the form. Believe me, I've seen every variation of the name "Celina" that's possible: Celena, Selina, Selena, Saliva, Sleestack--you name it, I have a rejection with that name set on the wrong line, in a different font and bigger than the rest of the form typed out by some unpaid intern ready to make it big in the publishing industry. Yep, I get it. It sucks. It sucks badly.
But, are rejections necessarily a bad thing? See, I don't think so.
Every rejection teaches me something about my writing. All form rejections? My writing didn't stand out enough in the agent/publisher's mind to warrant a personal rejection. It just plain wasn't ready, or the entity I submitted it to wasn't the best source to turn to. Lots of requests, no offers? Those rejections hurt the worst. It means my query letter was good and did its job and my first two or three chapters were really strong--strong enough to get someone excited about the work. But, in the end, the story didn't sustain itself for a full read for either the agent or the publisher--and that means it probably wouldn't keep a reader's interest either. Rejections off requested manuscripts indicates there's something wrong with the story--but that it's probably fixable. And then there are the personal rejections, the ones where you know the agent/publisher really wanted to like your work but it fell just short. And in these times, that tiny bit of shortness was an acceptance or a revise/resubmit letter.
When I first started writing with the goal of publication, I created my Wall of Shame. It started off as a joke: I wanted to see how many rejections it would take before I got that first acceptance. (It took over 80, by the way) But since then, I've printed off and tacked up rejections that were either particularly helpful (ie-the agents I would query again) or particularly funny. (The lovely mistakes one can make with a form rejection--like sending one to Mr. Celina Summes. Those are always hysterical) Every once in a while, I go through and weed through them, getting rid of ones that have lost their charm and re-reading the personalized ones for clues as to what I need to be concentrating on. Those rejections never fail to cheer me up in a perverse sort of way. Maybe it's because I'm a masochist. Maybe it's because I'm reinforcing my drive to continue. Who knows?
But it works.
It's easy to get discouraged. It's even easier to use those rejections as a sort of weapon, battering the entire publishing industry and thinking that it's 'unfair' or 'biased' or 'stupid.' It's not. Writers--all writers, including myself--have to learn eventually that rejections are actually tools you can use to gauge the market, evaluate your writing and determine which agencies or publishers are most amenable to the way that you write. So instead of getting depressed because you got that rejection in your email, get off your ass and get back to work. Write something new or rewrite what just got rejected. Search for a new market for the story or query the next agent on your list. Never allow yourself to get so depressed that you just can't bear the thought of one more "I'm sure another agent will feel differently and best of luck" email. Use it as a spur to perfect and hone your craft.
Because in the end, that's what it all boils down to. Success, in the end, depends upon your ability to persevere in the face of rejection.
Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." Good ol' Rough and Ready was absolutely right. If you want to be a career writer, you've got to recognize failure as your greatest teacher.
Success won't come to you; you have to go after it.
Now, if you'll excuse me--I have a novel to rewrite.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Recharging My Creative Batteries
Yep. I really need to.
That could have been the entire post, honestly. I'm producing words--quite a few of them in fact. I'm kind of stuck on determining what my next big project is going to be. I want to focus on fantasy, maybe, or perhaps another paranormal. Whatever it is, it's not the things I'm working on at the moment. I want the project that's going to get me excited, the one that's going to crank into high gear and drives me to produce. I want the idea that takes over my life and forces me to write about it.
Yeah, I know--I want, I want, I want. It's all about what I want. That's not what it should be about. It should be about what wants me to write it.
I think I need a vacation.
Sometimes, even seeing something new can get the creative juices going. That's what I need. Something to stimulate that one great idea.
So, I think I'm going to take a virtual vacation. I need to look at some new places, maybe read something that jogs some sort of inspiration. If that doesn't work, maybe I'll take a real vacation and see what that does. The one thing I know for certain is that I can't sit around and wait for that next great idea to take me. I need to go after it and find it.
Google images, here I come.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Heroism in Silence
I saw something very unusual today and I thought I'd share it with you.
My mother in law and I were on our way to lunch when we saw a whole mess of flashing lights on Memorial Drive, which is the main thoroughfare through Lancaster, Ohio which is were I live. My mother in law, noticing that the police had blocked off the entire road, turned onto a side street, went a couple of blocks up and started on a path parallel to the one we were originally taking. We hadn't gone two blocks when a patrol car pulled into the intersection one car ahead of us, lights flashing, and stopped.
My first thought was that there was some kind of dangerous situation. And then, I saw the first fire truck, draped with black gauze buntings and with a firefighter's protective jacket on the front grill and I knew what was happening.
On January 2, firefighters in Lancaster responded to an apartment fire. While supervising the crews battling the flames, Lt. Joseph McCafferty collapsed. He was taken to the hospital, and eventually passed away on January 16. He was only 59. He was the first Lancaster firefighter to fall in the line of duty since the days of horse-drawn fire engines.
What we were witnessing was his funeral cortege. And even then, it took me a few minutes to recognize the magnitude of what was happening in front of me.
The funeral procession, including the fire engine that carried Lt. McCafferty's casket, stretched a mile in length. It was comprised of fire engines, ambulances, emergency squads and fire chiefs from all over the state of Ohio--some from as far away as Canton and Dayton. All along the funeral route, flags were lowered to half staff--not only at government facilities but also in the front yards of private citizens.
Those private citizens also lined the streets. School kids watched in front of their schools. Police officers who were cordoning off the route stood at attention and saluted. The cars before and behind us all shut off their engines--and so did we. And we all watched as fire truck after fire truck passed in front of us. The fire chiefs in their red-painted cars looked out at us, rows of gold braid striping their sleeves.
There was a store on the left corner of these shops with a big display window, and the store employees stood in a row, witnessing the procession from indoors. And still the fire trucks kept coming. Some of the firefighters I saw were older men, salt and peppered hair brushed back neatly. Yet others didn't look old enough to drive much less drive a fire truck or carry people out of burning buildings. While there were many trucks from Lancaster and I saw lots of firemen I know, the majority of them were from other counties. They couldn't have had more than a passing acquaintanceship with Lt. McCafferty, but still they came to pay their respects to a man who'd literally given his life in the course of doing his duty.
The last time Lt. McCafferty had seen a rescue squad, he was a patient. Now they drove behind his casket to honor him. It got me thinking. We all remember (and probably always will) the incredible courage and gallantry of the first responders in New York City on 9/11. That bravery is now indelibly tattoed upon the men and women who serve in our fire departments or police departments all across the country, no matter where they serve. It doesn't matter if it's in a huge metropolis like NYC or a small town like Lancaster, we still look at our first responders the same way, a way that has changed since 9/11 and strengthened our respect for the people who risk their lives in order to save ours.
Lt. Joseph McCafferty didn't die while rescuing people from a burning building. He wasn't shot by a criminal. But still, his death is tragic. He is not a hero for how he died. He is a hero for how he lived.
The local newspaper, the Lancaster Eagle Gazette, related the final tribute to Joseph McCafferty in their article this afternoon about the funeral. The 911 dispatchers sounded the tones for the fire department three times. Three times they called for Lt. Joseph McCafferty. Three times, they received no reply.
Finally, the dispatcher said, "For all fire personnel, this will be Lt. McCafferty's last call."
Rest in peace and good voyage to you, sir.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







